a description of the features of that knowledge, for it is through such knowledge that we believe we have truth. An examination of the characteristics of the types of knowledge has been undertaken in greater depth on this prompt in this blog: https://mytok.blog/2019/11/30/ct-1-perspectives-woks/.
TOK Exhibition by Hennd Benabderrazak - Prezi In exploring the word culture, we must understand that world-view and world-picture are not interchangeable as to their meanings. In active experience, we go forth to look for something. On a shop which sells Antique Hand Bags near here is a sign which reads: The Shop is not Open because it is Closed. An old story which Plato speaks about in his Theaetetus is that Thales, while occupied in studying the heavens above and looking up, fell into a well. One is laid beside the other so that the one is orientated and conforms to the other by means of a relationship that you will establish. As part of your education, empirical science is an experience in which you conduct experiments; by contrast, in literature or the arts you may be called upon to write an essay (an attempt, a test) based on personal experience or your experience of a text. People were willing, and still are willing, to pay outrageous prices for a product with Donald Trumps name on it even though the products themselves have been shown to be of an inferior quality. They may sometimes be understood as inner states, activities and processes that we are aware of or live through, but do not usually make objects of introspection or reflection. The counting on and relying on are the metaphysics that undergird what is the essence of technology as it is defined in these writings. William Blakes The Tyger and the framing of the fearful symmetry that is the tyger). They are either accepted or rejected and no further discourse is possible about them. Can new knowledge change established values or beliefs? The evidence is considered adequate when the idea in the mind corresponds to the object which is under investigation and that object gives us its reasons for being as it is. Experts help the societies of which they are members determine what is best to know within that society. As you know, you need to choose one of the 35 IA prompts to base your exhibition on.
TOK Talk: Can new knowledge change established values or beliefs? on 7. How can we distinguish between knowledge, belief and opinion? It is this that we call understanding. The language used by Plato in his dialogues, for instance, is an attempt to get beyond the chit-chat of everyday speech, the language we most commonly use in our everyday dealings with things and with others. You are required to choose one prompt from the list below, and it must be exactly from this list and you cannot change the wording. The seeing is not based on science as the seeing is outside the purview of science. Other connotations of the word imply some things importance or value such as a disputed goal in football where we say the goal counts i.e. The development of the media from the Gutenberg press to modern social apps and the consequences of these developments is certainly a topic or theme that can be addressed here.
Exhibition.pdf - Can New Knowledge Change Established Values or Beliefs That which is animate is also included here in this determination of being as object: nothing distinguishes humans from other animals or species (Darwins Origin of Species). This is usually done through reason as logic, through analogy or metaphor i.e. Answer (1 of 6): Can yes, Will no. 16. Not having a complete personal knowledge of how the computer or hand phone functions is not really necessary unless they do not work and we must consult the experts to find out what has gone wrong. 3. If the "newly acquired knowledge" makes significantly more sense than the "established" values, it would seem to make good sense to change your values, providing the new knowledge does not violate your ethics or morals. Logos is a reckoning that orients ourselves to some other thing i.e. If one follows through on this distinction between ignorance and madness, one can see that a great deal of madness is prevalent today in advanced societies. We doubt a claim when we are lacking certainty and reliability regarding those who are making the claim, the sources of the claim, or when the things about which the claim is being made are not sufficiently justified, that is sufficient reasons have not been supplied for the claim. You will then find three objects or images of objects that relate to this prompt and develop your interpretation accordingly. 16. The doing of unethical or unlawful actions will become de riguer as they take their place within the worlds corporations. For the interpretation of a result as a result is conducted with the help of the principle (the principle of reason, for instance), presupposed, but not grounded. What this means is that something is, something can only be identified as a being/thing, only if it is stated in a sentence that satisfies the fundamental principle of reason as its founding i.e.. it is the fundamental principle of all that is, including statements made to others. This is what you are attempting to do in your Exhibition. Reliability is that which can be counted on in any situation that we are concerned with from the choosing of snow tires to the choosing of the surgeon for our next operation, so in many respects this prompt is similar to Prompt #1 in that both the end and use and the characteristics of the knowledge with which we wish to engage and use are at play here. For a thing to be in the first place, reason must supply its being and the thing must give itself back to the inquiring subject as being able to be known through calculation and measurement i.e. We find such certainty and surety in the knowledge that results from mathematical calculation; that is, mathematical calculation is a predication of the subject knowledge i.e. Adherents of the same world-picture may hold different world-views and enter into conflict employing the weapons supplied by their common world-picture. This calculus also determines how we view a work of art and gives rise simultaneously, during the 17th and 18th centuries, to the theory of aesthetics, how we view, define and subsequently speak about art and beauty. This need for the surety of what some thing is gives rise to our preference for mathematical calculus as that which represents knowledge in modernity. On most occasions we do not and this is due to our relation to the objects of the world that we have brought before us. Your rationale for establishing the relations between the objects/images will be based on the principle of sufficient reason and will demonstrate and answer the questions what, why, and how. However, the soul in need of purification shuts itself off from such instruction because it feels it does not need the purification to begin with because it believes that it already knows. What counts as a good justification for a claim? This choice of images or objects is your own, but the truth and knowledge in the representational thinking regarding their relation to each other will not be of your doing or making. A reason is this sort of reason only if it is aratio,that is an account given about something that is in front of the person as a judging I and is given to this I. Judgement itself is nottruth; judgement is only true when the reason for the connection is specified, when theratioor account is given. Information only informs when the data which comprises it is placed within a system (the form) that allows it to in-form. That we do not know in the traditional sense does not matter: what matters is the reliability of the results. why must a reason be explicitly brought forward i.e. The roles of the media in its various forms is something that will need to be addressed. When the reason for the connection of the representations has been directed back to the I, what is represented first comes to a stand such that it is securely established as an object for the representing subject.
Can new knowledge change established values or beliefs? While language first has to do with hearing, its purpose is to make us see the thing that is named. Modern technology employs modern science. Such a rendering needs a place where the account can be given and rendered.
IB TOK Exhibition example: Theory of Knowledge - Clastify When we say that science is the theory of the real, we are saying that science is the viewing that allows the interpretation of the being of things to be objects and to be understood as reality. Exhibition. You have to complete the exhibition individually (no more groups) and make sure no one in your TOK class or school uses the same objects or images in their exhibition. It was the Greek fundamental experience of the being of beings which underlay, and gave rise to, both the subject-predicate form of their language (and, thus, our English language) and their conception of a thing as a subject (subjectum) with accidents (qualities, what we experience of the thing through sensory perception). Your Exhibition is a rendering that is handed over to others i.e. While the perceived value of a product or a brand in the past usually accrued over time, nowadays the value of a product is truly in the eyes of a beholder rather than in the usefulness or good of the product itself. It is a logical relation between two propositions that fails to hold only if the first is true and the second is false; or it can bea logical relationship between two propositions in which if the first is true, the second must also be true. Our being-in-the-world is permeated by a lack of knowledge. The Greek polis is not properly understood as a culture, and we do not translate Platos Republic, for instance, as Platos Culture, yet the discussions in that dialogue are what we would understand as culture. Answer: Updating beliefs with new knowledge should be heavily influenced by motivation and epistemological values. Your first step is to ensure that you understand what principles and key concepts are involved in the prompt you have chosen.
The Theory of Knowledge Exhibition Prompts - IBMastery Prompt 11: Can new knowledge change established values and beliefs? A good explanation, like good evidence, provides reasons for the answers to the questions whence, why and how. pistis [pstis]; Lat. Works of art, poems, and tragedies are all perceived as things, and the manner of our questioning about them is done through research, the calculation that determines why the things/the works are as they are through historical studies. What the light of a project reveals are possibilities captured in the interpretation. A total world-view cannot understand itself, for from this understanding would come a questioning that would put the total world-view in question. . You will notice, though, that human beings do not cause the health: health itself is an outcome of nature. What is a value? https://wordpress.com/block-editor/post/mytok.blog/3676, https://mytok.blog/2019/11/30/ct-1-perspectives-woks/.
Can new knowledge change established values and beliefs? - WordPress.com Our imposition on nature to bring about any ends that we may have in view presents us with challenges and dangers that are most difficult to understand and to overcome. how reality is conceived. The a priori is not true or correct beyond the project which it helps to define: The a priori is the title for what we believe is the essence of things i.e. In the examples that I frequently use from the Greeks, all of them are translations of that language. The intention of this writing is to provoke thought on your part so that you are mindful of your choices and, hopefully, gain greater knowledge of who you are so that you will be able to make more aware judgements in the future about academic and ethical questions. True education is the leading out and a liberation towards seeing revealed truth. Infatuation is a common example, not simply for another human being but for the outward appearances of things. However, such knowledge has also brought about many ills and challenges that we are now trying to overcome and must overcome if we are to sustain life on this planet. the doctors knowledge is that of abetting what is true of nature in regard to the health of human beings. We call them universities but this is a misnomer. It can mean to learn, find out, hear of, but also to receive, undergo, something. values or beliefs? Doubt was a requisite for thought for it inspired wonder. But notice that the objects being spoken about must have already presented themselves to us in some fashion in order for our statements to be made about them i.e. Sophia and episteme arenot opinion because they are already complete i.e. Opinion is not a seeking for knowledge but is something someone already has whether it be true or false because an opinion can be true or false. Each historical age has its own particular concept of greatness; and our concept of greatness is purely quantitative, the gigantic not only gigantic monuments, but the traversal of vast distances at immense velocities, etc. The comment should also justify the inclusion of the object in the exhibition and explain its links to the IA prompt (i.e. But while these world-pictures are constructed in dealing with the beings that are involved in those domains, it is technology as the theoretical viewing that dominates how the beings will be inquired about and the manner of questioning regarding their being. The main problem that you will be faced with in this prompt is that it is so broad that a focus is required, and you can begin to do so by looking at how values and beliefs changed in any number of areas of knowledge. Admittedly, our mathematical formulas no longer picture nature but merely represent our own grasp of nature. Thoughtful connections can be made here. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); https://anchor.fm/john-rick-butler/episodes/Introduction-to-Theory-of-Knowledge-An-Alternative-Approach-er4qvq, https://anchor.fm/john-rick-butler/episodes/CT-1-Basic-Concepts-equfll, CT 1: Knowledge and the Knower: Historical Background, CT: The Exhibition: A Glossary of Prompts, The Assault on Truth: Real Life Situations (RLS)Observations, OT 4: Knowledge and Religion: Introduction, OT 4: Knowledge and Religion: Dewey and Education, OT 4: Knowledge and Religion: Christianity: Thoughts on the Lords Prayer, The Natural Sciences as an Area of Knowledge, The Natural Sciences: Historical Background, Notes on Ancient Greek Philosophy and Modern Science, Darwin and Nietzsche: Part II: The Essence of Truth as Representation, Darwin and Nietzsche Part IV: Metaphysics as Logic: The Grounds of the Principle of Reason.
can new knowledge change established values or beliefs? Arkadiusz Wargacki People tend to recognize their knowledge as the only correct image of reality surrounding them, as something indisputable and unchangeable. We demand that things give us the reasons for their being the way they are. See the link: What is a work of Art? can new knowledge change established values or beliefs objects. Although dialectic is now considered a complex philosophical term, in its original sense it could mean nothing more than a discussion among friends at Starbucks over coffee. In Latin, this account is ratio:the ground of the truth of judgement isratio. The students asked questions like 'What is the relationship between knowledge and culture?' or 'Can new knowledge change established values and beliefs?'. can new knowledge change established values or beliefs objects. A link that might be of some help with a discussion of this broad theme is posted here: The Natural Sciences: Historical Background. A central feature of tragic literature in the West is that it gives us a view of the implications of what results when knowledge is lacking, particularly self-knowledge. A current example could be the claims made by Alan Dershowitz, a prominent professor of law from Harvard University, in the impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump. Suffice it to say that it must be asked: where in all human activity do human beings encounter their essence, what they truly are? Every posing of every question takes place within that which is granted to us, our legacy, in its very presence in who and what we think we are. To what extent is objectivity possible in the production or acquisition of knowledge? what will be claimed and becomes knowledge. Sickness in the soul is determined to be an insurrection that results when the mode of comportment of the soul comes into conflict with another mode of comportment; we might call this a conflict of conscience. 8. We view material tools as technology, but as our writing on technology demonstrates, while this is a correct understanding of what technology is, it does not get us to the essence of technology: the tools are the outcome of what the essence of technology is and they are brought into being because technology provides the open space for their ability to be. The emergence of the world-picture and the knowledge and culture derived from it involves an essential decision about beings as a whole. Our word monster finds its root inmonere or warning. It lacks evident correctness, evidence. Whenever we speak of the production of knowledge, we are speaking of the bringing forth of what was once hidden into presence so that we may see it face to face. The acronyms and the specialized language in use in those communities are not things that those outside of the community are familiar with. It may be useful to you to determine which prompts belong to the same sub-group in terms of their main theme. It is very important that your exhibition is based on one of the prescribed prompts. 25. as an object. It determines the possibilities and the potentialities of the things as disposable in some fashion for human ends. Ours has been an age of progress in that the knowledge that has been produced from the technological viewing of the world has brought about many benefits. Judgements and statements are correct, that means true, only if the reason for the connection of subject and predicate is rendered, given back to the representing I. A central feature of tragic literature in the West is that it gives us a view of the implications of what results when knowledge is lacking, particularly self-knowledge. and For what purpose? For example, the statement: Mathematical knowledge is certain is a second-order knowledge claim because it is about mathematical knowledge, and the tools that are suggested by this prompt will usually be related to the knowledge that is produced mathematically. The demands of the principle of rendering sufficient reasons creates the lack of clarity and confusion in our actions, our ethics. I know this will likely bother anyone who is interested in order and logic, but I've decided to break the order of prompts so I can publish them as I record them. The German philosopher Kant grounded this viewing in his Critique of Pure Reason. 19. rendered, and to whom or to what is a reason rendered? We can see its relation to what is now called algorithms. They are what can be learned and what can be taught i.e. Our understandings and interpretations of our experiences are, for the most part, culturally determined and this is what we have come to call shared knowledge. your cognition of the things, should come to a greater light or understanding through this exercise.